In honour of Boeung Kak women: Why we should be celebrating not slating housewives

2 April 2013

Image of In honour of Boeung Kak women: Why we should be celebrating not slating housewives

NB: A shortened version of this blog can be found in The Guardian and The Telegraph

The label ‘housewife’ has become vexed to say the least. In Britain it is often understood as a derogatory term. It can evoke images of social and political isolation, the loss of individual identity, and an over-zealous pursuit to ‘keep up with the Joneses’ through competitive parenting and property. This stereotyping is dangerous.

Housewives are not monolithic creatures uniformly ordained into a self-serving cult of domesticity. We need to make more room to celebrate, rather than robotically deride women who identify themselves as housewives and who prioritise homemaking. This unjust vision of the disconnected and insular minded housewife does disservice to huge numbers of women in Britain and beyond who are actively using this role to benefit not only those who fall under their roofs, but also wider society.

Tep Vanny

Tep Vanny, Vital Voices award winner, speaking to the media outside the US Embassy calling for the release of Yorm Bopha (February, 2013)

Today, America Ferrera is in Washington DC to give an award that illustrates this very point. The Ugly Betty actress is presenting a ‘Vital Voices Leadership in Public Life Award’ to Tep Vanny, a self-branded housewife, who has become a guiding light in Cambodia’s battle against forced evictions. Carried out in the name of ‘progress’, forced evictions now rank as one of the world’s most serious human rights abuses. Amnesty International defines forced eviction when people are forced out of their homes and off their land against their will, with little notice or none at all, often with the threat or use of violence. And in Cambodia, a country devastated by the pursuit of profit, it is housewives who have come out fighting against them.

In 2007, the Chinese backed private development company Shukaku Inc, was granted a 99-year lease to build on and around Boeung Kak Lake in central Phnom Penh. The company went on to fill the lake with sand, destroying approximately 10,000 residents’ homes, and submerging peoples’ lives with it. Further still are under threat. As one community member told me as part of my academic research, the government ‘are trying to eradicate poverty by displacing the poor from the city where they can hide our poverty. This is what they mean by poverty eradication. They don’t care how we will survive, if we live or die. They ruin our homes, our incomes, we are left with absolutely nothing’.

Homes destroyed at Boeung Kak

Heng Mom staring across her submerged home (February 2013)

Western feminists should not lose sight of the fact that in many countries around the world, women’s role as wife and mother remains central to their family and societal status. When homes are threatened with destruction, it is women who are disproportionally affected. While women are commonly framed as defenceless ‘soft targets’ in forced evictions, Tep Vanny and her fellow housewives complicate this assumption. Harnessing softness as a strategy rather than hindrance, these women have committed themselves to a sustained campaign of non-violent protest. Worried that involving men would only encourage more extreme violence, ‘turning men into goldfish clashing with each other’, they are using their positions as wives and mothers to co-opt riot police through their songs of suffering, and morally shame them when they are publically beaten. Yet many have experienced arrest as a consequence of their activism, with Yorm Bopha still imprisoned despite international calls for her release.

In contrast to British stereotypes of the inward looking housewife, these women are committed housewives and forward thinking political activists. Their influence extends far beyond the homes they care for. Wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan ‘The Whole World is Watching’, one of the women explained that with guidance from NGOs, the group has become experts of spectacle courted by the international media. Exposing their bare breasts outside the Cambodian parliament, they aimed to demonstrate the vulnerability of being left only with their bodies. And donning birds’ nests complete with chicks on their heads, they came out in defence of their role as mother hens.

Not content with these national displays of resistance, the housewives took a lead role in submitting a complaint to the World Bank, insisting that it had breached its operational policies. The World Bank admitted that its land titling project had contributed to the harms suffered, and suspended its loans to Cambodia.

Campaign HQ for Boeung Kak women

The housewives of Boeung Kak are playing a critical leadership role in publically contesting large-scale losses of home that are being felt in communities sadly too numerous to name. In taking on this extra burden, housewives in Cambodia have become domestic goddesses battling global problems. While Nigella Lawson in How To Be a Domestic Goddess writes that baking is about ‘reclaiming our lost Eden’, for scores of women in the developing world, it is protest, not baking, that is being harnessed to secure ‘Eden’ – or more profoundly- basic human rights to adequate housing.

So what does this mean for the British housewife? While forced evictions are thankfully not a reality that we find on our front door steps, the courage of the Boeung Kak women is not without precedent in the UK. We only need to think back to Greenham Common in the 1980s for an example of housewife activists who fought to protect their families against the feared installment of nuclear weapons in Southern England. Both sets of women, whether in Cambodia or Britain, show the power that housewives can wield, of illuminating injustices at the highest of political levels.

Setting up camp at Greenham Common (BBC News In Pictures, September 2011)

An arrest at Greenham Common (BBC News In Pictures, September 2011)

Put to one side Nigella and her cake and we find other domestic goddesses at work. Tep Vanny and the women of Boeung Kak may not have won the geopolitical battle against forced evictions in Cambodia, but they have shown that housewives should not be slated, but rewarded, for their inspirational dedication to domestic life.

Gender, Violence and Rights in Cambodia: 2013 Research and Engagement

14 March 2013

Image of Gender, Violence and Rights in Cambodia: 2013 Research and Engagement

It has been a busy start to 2013 taking forward ESRC/DFID funded research in Cambodia on legal reform and domestic violence; carrying out new research on women and forced eviction; and dipping my toes into policy and media engagement. Here’s some of what I have been up to.

Research: In February I travelled to Cambodia to spend the month working on the qualitative aspect of the ESRC/DFID project which is looking to understand the hiatus between legislative change and quality of life improvements for women (see here for the participatory video workshops and large-scale quantitative survey completed in 2012). After providing training in Phnom Penh, I spent 3 days in Pursat province with the project’s coordinator, Reaksmey, and two research assistants, Chandy and Davy. We piloted interviews with men and women at the village level to understand their knowledge, use of, and perspectives to, the law as well as associated issues around women’s rights. After a solid six weeks of further fieldwork by the team, we are now the proud custodians of audio material currently being translated and transcribed from 80 participants, 40 of whom had direct experience of domestic violence in Pursat and Siem Reap provinces.

Domestic violence prevention poster in rural Pursat

Domestic violence prevention poster in rural Pursat

A second research project also took shape. Entitled ‘Intimate Geopolitics: Women, Home-grown Activism, and Forced Evictions in Cambodia’ I interviewed 20 women who are being threatened with, or have been, evicted from their homes. In the name of economic development and urban modernisation, thousands of homes in Cambodia are being demolished. And it is women who have increasingly come to the forefront of the battle against forced evictions. I concentrated on two communities, Boeung Kak Lake, at the front line of protests (as I witnessed outside the US Embassy), and Trapeang Anh Chan re-settlement site where displaced railway inhabitants have been controversially moved to.

Empty plots at Trapeang Anh Chan 'resettlement' site

Empty plots at Trapeang Anh Chan 'resettlement' site

UN Learning Seminar: During my trip to Cambodia I also delivered a United Nations Learning Seminar in Phnom Penh. A Joint UN Learning Needs Assessment conducted in 2012 identified the need for, and interest of, UN staff in participating in learning events focused on gender mainstreaming and critical thinking skills. I presented a research paper based on a book I planning entitled ‘Home S.O.S: Gender, Violence and Rights in Cambodia’. Covering timely issues from marital breakdown, domestic violence and forced eviction, the seminar foregrounded how domestic life in Cambodia is a current-day political background for human rights issues.

Presenting at the UN Learning Seminar with Reaksmey to my left

Presenting at the UN Learning Seminar with Reaksmey to my left

UK Select Committee on Violence against Women and Girls: For the first time I wrote a written submission for a parliamentary Select Committee. In my submission I outlined three (and inter-related) areas of concern that I argued the UK government should act upon further in respect to violence against women: legal reform; social norms; and the domestic sphere. My full report can be found here.

Guardian Development Network: Another first was writing an opinion piece called ‘Legal reform is not the silver bullet to free women from violence’. Reflecting on the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW57) drawing to a close in New York, the article explored why discriminatory gender norms are hindering women’s ability to claim rights accorded to them. The full piece can be found here.

The rest of 2013 should be equally as exciting. For the ESRC/DFID project we are moving into the final research phase with stakeholders who hold responsibility for implementing and enforcing Cambodia’s domestic violence law. I will be speaking on a Women and Geography Study Group (WGSG) plenary panel (again for the first time!) at the Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers Annual Conference in London on ‘Gendered Violences’; and hopefully providing comments to UNWomen on Cambodia’s 2nd National Action to Prevent Violence against Women.

Researching Geographical Frontiers Between Violence and Peace

22 December 2012

Image of Researching Geographical Frontiers Between Violence and Peace

Call for Papers: Royal Geographical Society with IBG Annual Conference
London, 28th-30th August 2013

Mary Cobbett & Katherine Brickell

Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London

(Co-sponsored by Participatory Geographies Research Group and Political Geography Research Group)

Researching violence, whether its prevalence, perceptions of it or its prevention is beset by methodological and ethical complexities. Many types of violence, such as that occurring in ‘private’ spaces of the home or intimate relationships can rarely be directly observed. Women are particularly affected by this ‘hidden’ violence. Additionally, conventional methods of interviews and surveys have often been limited in understanding the complexities of violence or capturing the temporal and spatial dynamics of violent events. Whether violence occurs in ‘private’ or ‘public’ spaces, however, the emotive and sensitive nature of the topic creates methodological challenges. The potential to cause harm, direct or indirect, to participants (as well as to researchers) makes violence an unsettling choice of research.

Yet, researching violence (and its absences) also has the potential to lead to positive change and to redress what has been identified as an overwhelming focus on ‘war’ or conflict in comparison to ‘peace’ in political geographical research. This can be approached both indirectly, through new understandings gleaned, and directly, through participation in research itself – ‘getting messy’ by moving beyond ‘dry and distant analysis’ as Sara Koopman (2011) has termed this. This could be pursued, for example, through facilitating processes that confront violent views or through creating safe spaces for those who have experienced violence to come to terms with their experiences. In this vein, the session is again interested in the recent and growing focus of Geographers on the inter-relations between ‘war’ and ‘peace’ (Loyd, 2012; Megoran, 2010; Williams and McConnell, 2011). What methodological approaches can scholars use to explore their mutual constitution and the potential for transition between violence to peace? How have Geographers become purposely or unintentionally entangled in such (everyday) politics through their fieldwork?

Taking the above into account, researching bodies, spaces and scales between violence and peace can be seen as a ‘new frontier’ in geographical research, an arena requiring innovative approaches, but through which societal challenges can be addressed. Abstracts are invited which reflect on methodological challenges or discuss innovative approaches relating to any aspect of violence, peace, justice or hope. Themes could include (but are not limited to):

• Participatory methods
• Ethics and harm in violence research
• Challenging violence through research
• Research with children
• Research in conflict zones
• Measuring prevalence
• Capturing dynamics of violence/peace
• Understanding perceptions of violence/peace

We are looking for abstracts of 300 words to be sent to Mary.Cobbett.2012@live.rhul.ac.uk by Wednesday 30th January 2013.